Author, Matt Gaynor, Director of Surety, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.

People from outside the surety bond industry will sometimes ask if we work for 1) the carrier (bond company) or 2) the contractor client. This is an easy one. While we are approved to issue bonds by the 20+ carriers we are appointed with, make no mistake that we work 100% for our clients. 

The thought for this article came about when a potential new client mentioned to me that he felt his broker was not working very hard on his behalf to increase his aggregate bond program. During a phone call where the client was providing the broker with a narrative of information to pass along to the bond company, the broker mentioned that he didn’t want to, “push too hard” because he had a number of accounts with the bond company and did not want to negatively affect that relationship.

Whether a broker has 1 or 10 accounts placed with a particular carrier, you should ethically treat each account individually, working as hard as possible to create the best program for your client. Our industry promotes very high standards regarding the servicing of our accounts, and the State of California requires agents to complete three hours of ethics training every two years. I am certain this is covered during the training.

Looking at this from the carrier viewpoint, if the bond company supported an account mainly because a broker placed numerous accounts with that company (yet the underwriting of the account did not meet the bond company requirements) that would open the door for them to accept undue risk of future losses. At some point, one of these accommodation-type accounts will fail and cause a loss that the bond carrier could have avoided. 

If you would like to discuss the client-broker-carrier relationship, please contact me at (619) 937-0165 or mgaynor@ranchomesa.com.