Are Bonded Projects Really Better Performers than Non-Bonded Projects?
Author, Anne Wright, Surety Relationship Executive, Rancho Mesa Insurance Services, Inc.
The goal of the surety, in any relationship, is to ensure that the bonded job is completed successfully, is profitable for their client, and is without claims.
In their attempt to understand the risk versus reward of a given bonded project, the surety can add some value by reviewing certain aspects of a particular request.
To that end, the surety considers each request for a bond on its own merits. If the bond is for a routine project (based on the contractor’s history and track record), then it will likely be a pretty routine process for issuing the bond based on the contractor’s past performance, history, etc. However, something out of the wheelhouse for a given contractor might find the surety contemplating certain details about the request. They may ask more about the type of project and past experience on similar jobs and resources needed. The surety may want to know if this project has an adequate schedule, the profit and related costs of the job, information about the owner requesting the bond, bond forms, and the contract. In reviewing the contract, the surety is not just looking at the general form of the contract, but also various provisions like payment and retention terms, liquidated damages, schedules, etc. And, you might find your surety agent asks what you like about the job or what challenges you see in the job if it is outside of your normal scope and size. Every now and then, a client comments that they appreciate these discussions – and the extra set of eyes to make sure key factors in the job, bid, or contract were not missed.
Many sureties can also provide some input relating to contract review, especially if a client is working for a new project owner, or a general contractor who has a reputation for being tough.
And, if your work is for a private owner, the surety will typically want to confirm that there are construction funds earmarked to make sure the contractor gets paid. That information should be available in generalities in the preliminary notice information, but having the surety asking to confirm specifically that their contractor’s money is available to pay for their line items (and any contingency) can be a real benefit.
Also, keep in mind that the contractor (the business owner) typically has their personal indemnity on the line if things go wrong and the surety has to respond to a claim – one might presume that the contractor is paying extra attention to a bonded job where there is more on the line.
So, at the end of the day, the services provided by underwriting the bond request can add that extra value in making sure there is no loss. The extra attention may also result in a more successful project. And, the job should be a good performer.
Don’t just take my word for it. Overall, the industry agrees that unbonded projects have a higher likelihood to default, or have more significant problems. The case can certainly be made that with the partnership and value of the surety team supporting a contractor in their efforts to have a successful job, more attention is paid to those critical components to ensure that this is the case.
An article by Vicki Speed, “A Study in Surety Effectiveness, Reassessing Exposures,” published in the July 10/17, 2023 issue of ENR Magazine confirmed the value of surety bonding. According to a survey of owners and developers cited in the article, “bonded projects are more likely to be completed on time or ahead of schedule.”
Remember, the surety is not here to tell you how to run your business or your projects. Only to support your success. It should be seen as a valued partnership that is beneficial to the owners who require the bonds.
For more information about bonding jobs, contact me at (619)486-6570 or awright@ranchomesa.com.